fix: correct NLB service prewarming when ReserveNlbNum=0#333
Conversation
chrisliu1995
commented
Apr 23, 2026
- Re-query NLB list after creating new NLBs in ensurePrewarming
- Use NLBPoolIndexLabel instead of array index in prewarmServices
- Add unit tests for reserve=0 prewarming scenarios
- Add proposal document for the fix
- Re-query NLB list after creating new NLBs in ensurePrewarming - Use NLBPoolIndexLabel instead of array index in prewarmServices - Add unit tests for reserve=0 prewarming scenarios - Add proposal document for the fix
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #333 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 40.77% 40.71% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 112 112
Lines 12549 14951 +2402
==========================================
+ Hits 5117 6087 +970
- Misses 7020 8449 +1429
- Partials 412 415 +3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|